Roth vs Traditional IRA Calculator
Compare after-tax retirement balance for Roth (after-tax in, tax-free out) vs Traditional IRA (pre-tax in, taxable out).
Result
- Annual contribution$7,000
- Years compounding30
- Expected return7.00%
- Current marginal tax24.0%
- Retirement marginal tax22.0%
- Total contributed (over period)$210,000
- Pre-tax FV in either account$707,511
- โ Traditional IRA path โ
- FV pre-tax$707,511
- After-tax at retirement$551,859
- Annual upfront tax saving$1,680 (invested in taxable brokerage at same return)
- Taxable brokerage FV (after LTCG)$151,892
- Traditional + taxable side after-tax total$703,751
- โ Roth IRA path โ
- FV (= after-tax โ tax-free withdrawal)$707,511
- โ Verdict โ
- Roth โ Traditional (after-tax)Positive = Roth wins.$3,760
- VerdictRoth wins by $3,760 โ your retirement rate is at or above your current rate.
Step-by-step
- Annuity-due FV: C ยท ((1+r)^N โ 1)/r ยท (1+r) = $707,511.
- Traditional pre-tax FV = $707,511; after 22.0% tax = $551,859.
- Roth has same FV and is tax-free โ $707,511.
- Apples-to-apples: invest the upfront-tax saving ($1,680/yr) at same return in a taxable account โ $151,892 after LTCG at 15%.
- Verdict: Roth wins by $3,760 โ your retirement rate is at or above your current rate.
How to use this calculator
- Enter your planned annual contribution (the 2026 limit is $7,500 / $8,500 over 50).
- Enter years until withdrawal โ usually retirement age minus current age.
- Set current marginal tax rate (federal + state, your top bracket today).
- Set retirement marginal tax rate โ usually 2-5 pp lower than today's rate because retirement income is typically lower than peak earning years.
- Leave "invest tax savings" set to YES for the apples-to-apples comparison.
About this calculator
Roth and Traditional IRAs are mathematically equivalent if your tax rate is the same now and at retirement. They diverge when those rates differ: lower tax rate now favours Roth (pay tax cheaply now, withdraw free later); lower tax rate at retirement favours Traditional (defer tax to a cheaper bracket). The honest comparison invests the Traditional's up-front tax savings in a taxable brokerage at the same return โ otherwise Roth looks artificially worse just because it costs more out-of-pocket per year. The IRS contribution limit ($7,500 under 50 / $8,500 over 50 for 2026) is identical for both, and that limit is in after-tax dollars for Roth but pre-tax for Traditional, which is the mathematical core of the comparison. Real-world considerations not modeled here: required minimum distributions (RMDs) apply to Traditional but NOT to Roth (a meaningful advantage for estate planning); income limits restrict direct Roth contributions above ~$165k single / $246k MFJ in 2026 (the backdoor-Roth conversion is the workaround); state taxes on the Traditional withdrawal vary widely.